Skip to content
Open We invite collaborations: researchers, practitioners and institutions Proposals Four practice proposals, open for comment Near Miss Research Episode 1 is out: the 200,000 in your TRIR Free ASP Exam Prep is live Road to ASP Class 1: Tuesday 27 October New Free CSP Exam Prep is live
Independent safety research and media

Catch it at the near miss.

We check the numbers behind safety, explain what they miss in plain language, and turn the evidence into open practice proposals that anyone, anywhere, can check.

Get each new episode and paper by email

4working papers
4practice proposals
3ASP classes a week
2,000ASP questions
2,000CSP questions
Nopaid sponsors
New · Free CSP Exam Prep

Free ASP and CSP prep, in 90 seconds

2,000 original CSP questions with every answer explained, an 8-week study plan, five timed mocks with an exam-style calculator, and The Catch certificate. No paywall.

Start free CSP prepSubscribe on YouTube

Where do you want to start?

Four ways into the show, depending on what brought you here.

I work in safety

Check the numbers you report

Try the rate converter, then read what TRIR can and can't tell you.

Try the converter
I'm preparing for the ASP or CSP

Study with us, free

ASP: 2,000 original questions, 5 timed mocks and a 12-block plan. CSP: 2,000 original questions, 5 timed mocks and an 8-week plan.

ASP portal CSP portal
I want to watch and learn

Classes and series you can follow

Short episodes, real sources, and an expert panel to close each series.

See this week
The foundation we're building

From evidence to practice, in the open

Every working paper ends in a practice proposal. Each one moves through four stages, and anyone can comment before it's revised. The papers are working papers and have not yet been peer reviewed.

1ResearchA working paper tests the problem with evidence
2ProposalA clear practice proposal, labelled as a draft
3Open for commentPractitioners and institutions test it
4Revised guidanceUpdated after comment, free for anyone to use
Proposal 1 · Paper 1Draft

Verify, don't just close

Check incident actions at three stages, implemented, embedded and effective, before calling them done.

Proposal 2 · Paper 2Draft

Recognize the change

Name the four classes of change that slip past management of change, so they trigger a review.

Proposal 3 · Paper 3Draft

Watch the barriers

Four monthly barrier-health indicators that warn of major accident risk when TRIR looks clean.

Proposal 4 · Paper 4Draft

State the base

Report every injury rate with its hours base and the hours actually worked, so rates can be compared across countries.

Free email updates

Follow the foundation as it's built

Algorithms decide who sees a post. Email reaches you directly. Join safety professionals getting each new piece the day it's published.

  • New episodes from every series
  • New working papers, with a plain-language summary
  • Practice proposals when they open for your comments

One or two emails a month. No spam, never shared. Unsubscribe in one click. See our privacy notice.

Try it · Same safety, two numbers

Is 2.5 worse than 0.5?

Not necessarily. US rates count per 200,000 hours; many international companies count per 1,000,000. Move the sliders and watch the same site produce two very different numbers.

Based on Paper 4 and Near Miss Research Episode 1.

Watch the 6-minute episode
Per 200,000 hours (US base)3.75
Per 1,000,000 hours18.75

Why near misses

The base of the pyramid is where learning is cheapest

Pick a level to see what it tells you.

Ratio from Frank Bird's 1969 study of about 1.75 million incident reports. The exact ratio is debated, and injury counts don't predict major accidents (Paper 3).

1 10 30 600near misses we work here
On The Near Miss Show

Fixed days you can count on

Road to ASP runs three days a week and follows the free study portal. New series launch in November, and each gets a fixed day once it has held its schedule for a month.

Latest episode · Near Miss Research

The 200,000 in your TRIR is a 1971 US working year

Where the 200,000-hour base comes from, why it isn't an international standard, and how to compare rates fairly.

Subscribe on YouTube
Adnan Zafar (AZL), Founder and host of The Near Miss Show
Founder & Host

Adnan Zafar (AZL)

A chemical engineer and HSE professional working on safety management systems, audits, incident learning and management of change. He founded The Near Miss Show to check the numbers his profession relies on, and to publish the evidence openly.

9+years in HSE across oil and gas, power and construction
4open-access working papers as an independent researcher
BEngChemical Engineering, Lancaster University
Connect on LinkedIn
How every episode is made

Five steps, every time

The same method for every video, paper and study note. The full rules are in our editorial standards.

  1. Source

    Law, investigation reports and research first. Every number gets a source, year, unit and base.

  2. Script

    Plain language, with the conversions shown on screen.

  3. Check

    Every claim and every calculation re-checked against its source.

  4. Record

    Narrated by AZL in his own voice. No synthetic voices.

  5. Correct

    Errors fixed within 48 hours and logged in our public corrections log.

We invite collaborations

Good practice can't come from one person

If you want safety numbers to mean the same thing everywhere, work with us. Collaborators are credited by name, nothing is published without their approval, and we take no paid sponsorships.

Email a proposal

Co-author or review

Join a working paper, review a draft, or share data that tests a finding.

Join a panel

Every series closes with two or three subject experts. Be one of them.

Test the proposals

Professional bodies and universities: comment on the drafts before they're revised.

Teach or translate

Help bring the free study material to more people and languages.

About the show

Safety numbers, checked

The Near Miss Show explains the numbers and systems behind workplace safety in plain language, and turns the evidence into open, transparent practice proposals that anyone can check.

Most safety learning happens after someone is hurt. Our name is the idea: the cheapest lessons are in the near misses, the incidents that almost happened. We look at those lessons through three kinds of work:

Our rules

Every claim has a source. Every number has a year, unit and base. Mistakes are corrected within 48 hours and logged in public in our corrections log. No sponsorships, no affiliate links, no employer material.

Read our editorial standardsCorrections log
Founder & Host
Adnan Zafar (AZL)

Adnan Zafar (AZL)

Founder & Host, The Near Miss Show

A chemical engineer and HSE professional with more than nine years in oil and gas, power generation and construction. His work covers safety management systems, audits, incident learning, management of change and contractor safety.

He founded The Near Miss Show to explain what he learns in plain language, for the people doing the same work, and to publish the evidence behind it. He is studying for the BCSP ASP in public and writes the show's working papers as an independent researcher.

BEng (Hons) Chemical Engineering, Lancaster University NVQ Level 6 Diploma in OHS Practice NEBOSH International General Certificate IOSH Train the Trainer IOSH Managing Safely

Every script is written and fact-checked by AZL and narrated in his own voice. Views are his own and do not represent any employer.

Near Miss Research

What the safety numbers miss

Open access on Zenodo under CC BY 4.0. These are working papers and have not been peer reviewed.

Paper 4 · October 2026 · Commentary

The 200,000-Hour Base Is Not an International Standard

Where the 200,000 in TRIR comes from, why it is a US convention rather than an international standard, and how to compare rates fairly. Keep national differences in the hours, not the constant.

Read the paperWatch the video
Paper 3 · October 2026

A Clean TRIR Will Not Warn You: Four Leading Indicators of Major Accident Risk

Why injury rates can't warn that a major accident is building, and four monthly barrier-health indicators any plant can report from records it already keeps.

Read the paper
Paper 2 · September 2026

The Change Nobody Risk-Assesses: Why Management of Change Fails at the Recognition Stage

Most MOC failures happen before the procedure starts, because nobody recognizes the change. Four classes of change that bypass MOC, and five practical fixes.

Read the paper
Paper 1 · September 2026

Closed Is Not Effective: A Three-Stage Model for Verifying Incident Recommendations

Closure records that a task was done, not that risk went down. A three-stage check (Implemented, Embedded, Effective) with the evidence needed at each stage.

Read the paper

All papers by Adnan Zafar. ORCID 0009-0002-6904-5285

YouTube & videos

What's on, and when

Road to ASP has fixed days. New series launch in November and get a fixed day once each has held its schedule for a month. Each series closes with an expert panel.

Tue · Thu · SatRoad to ASP classes, following the study portal. Class 1: Tuesday 27 October.
From NovemberNew series: Measuring Safety; Permit-to-Work and Isolation (seasonal); Risk by Design; and expert podcast conversations. Days announced at launch.

Watch now

Subscribe on YouTube
CSP Exam Prep · now live

Free CSP Exam Prep is live

The Certified Safety Professional is the next step after the ASP. The CSP portal uses the same method as the ASP portal: a session-by-session plan built on the CSP11 blueprint, free official reading for every block, and original questions with every answer explained.

It is open now: an 8-week study plan, 1,000 original practice questions, five timed mock exams with 1,000 more, an exam-style calculator, a formula sheet, and The Catch certificate for clearing Mocks 2 to 5 at 70%.

Open the CSP portal
LinkedIn

Follow on LinkedIn

The Page posts episode releases, one-slide explainers and the weekly schedule. Every post has its source, and there are no job ads or promotions.

Collaborate with us

Work on the evidence with us

Our aim is a unified, open foundation for safety measurement and criteria. That needs many voices: researchers to test the ideas, practitioners to keep them real, and institutions to adopt what works.

Research

Co-author or review a paper

Join a working paper as a co-author, review a draft before it is published, or share data that tests a finding. Reviewers are credited by name.

Media

Join a podcast or expert panel

Every series closes with a panel of two or three subject experts. If you've worked on the topic, we'd like to hear from you.

Proposals

Test the proposed criteria

Professional bodies, regulators and universities can comment on our proposed definitions and criteria before they are finalized.

Learning

Teach and translate

Help turn the free study material into other languages, or contribute a guest class to the exam prep series.

How we work together

Everything we publish is open and sourced. Collaborators are credited, nothing goes out without their approval, and we don't accept payment for coverage.

Email a proposalMessage us on LinkedIn

Tell us who you are, what you'd like to work on, and any timing. We reply within a week.

Contact us

Get in touch

Collaboration proposals, podcast and panel guests, questions about the research, or an error you've spotted: write to us. Corrections are checked within 48 hours.

We use your message only to reply. See the privacy notice.